Psychology assignment 代寫:利用實驗進行社會測試

  • 100%原創包過,高質量代寫&免費提供Turnitin報告--24小時客服QQ&微信:273427
  • 有時,研究者會利用實驗來進行社會工作測試活動,以尋求有益的結果。盡管有這些人的參與,但實驗設計者總是能相信貼出了什么或什么樣的研究問題能得到相對滿意的答案。然而,測試也將用于進行心理研究,以收集受訪者的真實數據(Dunkel Schetter,2011)。因為實驗總是會發表一種有意義的話題,通過精心設計的方法學來尋求結果將是有用的。如果沒有實驗或測試,有時就無法保證將來如何開展研究活動。受訪者會根據特定的背景給出不同的反饋(Cuijpers,Smit,Bohlmeijer,Hollon&Andersson,2010)。因此,仍然有必要鼓勵參與者充分參與。
     
     
     
    心理領域的研究主要包括因果測驗和記憶測驗。參與者已經被告知他們在這個過程中應該做什么,以便有效地支持研究。然而,不同的測試階段會讓參與者做出不同的反應。無論人們如何看待這個實驗,當測試開始時,意味著所有的參與者都承諾將致力于展示道德和達到設計師的目標。一致性組和模糊性組在整個過程中都做出了貢獻。他們的反饋或評論也會因為他們有不同的特點而有所不同。
     
    為了達到研究目標,所有參與者都充分發揮了自己的作用。當他們進入那些被提議的餐館去調查與食物性疾病相關的研究問題時,他們表現得很積極。無論是點什么樣的餐,參與者都深刻地理解了如何做才能對完成這項任務起到有益的作用。如果沒有實驗,它肯定會表明,諺語或報告將有助于在社會工作中產生說服力(Heinrichs von Dawans&Domes,2009)。換言之,研究人員已經展示了他們的誠意,以及他們希望通過參與者的參與而獲得的東西。在這種情況下,參與者實際上會更主動地集中精力說明他們的智慧,以表明他們能夠幫助收集可靠的信息。
     
     
     
    一致組和不明確組導致的性能將不同。因此,一致性和模糊性群體的努力也會產生不同的結果。由于這兩個詞有其各自的含義,并且當將它們設置為參與的參與者時,通常會產生不同的結果。在這兩類人的頭腦中,他們在面對新工作、吃新食物或考慮如何為本研究項目做出貢獻等新事物時會有不同的態度。同時,不同性格的人在面對新事物時會有不同程度的能力,而新事物在認知過程中仍然會影響他們的態度。
     
     
     
    對于實驗設計者來說,明確指出參與者的相關義務是非常重要的。對于研究人員來說,他們更喜歡通過測試來發現真相,以支持分析。如果他們不能專業地讓參與者了解他們在項目中的特殊角色,即使所有人都很熱情,結果也無助于滿足研究人員在現實世界中希望獲得的東西(Fiske,2013)。因此,讓研究者與參與者進行有效的互動以達到預期效果,可以被視為一種挑戰。

    Psychology assignment 代寫:利用實驗進行社會測試

    Sometimes, researchers will use experiments to conduct social work testing activities for the purpose of seeking beneficial results to be gained. Though the participation of those people, experiment designers can always believe what have been posted or what kind of research questions can be given relatively satisfactory answers. However, testing also will be used to conduct psychological researches for the purpose of collecting real data from respondents (Dunkel Schetter, 2011). Since experiments always will post a kind of meaningful topic and to seek results will be useful through the well-designed methodology. Without experiments or testing, sometimes it cannot ensure how to conduct future research activities. Respondents will give different feedback on the basis of a certain context (Cuijpers, Smit, Bohlmeijer, Hollon & Andersson, 2010). So, it is still essential to encourage participants to engage in fully. 
     
    A method has been used to support the research within the psychological field which includes the causal test and the memory test. Participants have been informed about what they should do during the process for the purpose of supporting the research effectively. However, different testing stages will let participants make diverse responses. No matter how people will consider the experiment, when the testing has started which means all participants have promised to be engaged to show the ethics and to meet the goal of the designer. Both consistent group and ambiguous group have made their contribution during the whole process. Their feedback or comments will also be different due to they have different characteristics. 
    All participants have fully engaged in their roles for the purpose of meeting the research objective. When entering those proposed restaurants to examine the research question related to food-based illness, they have performed actively. No matter for ordering what kind of meals, participants have deeply understood how to do can play the beneficial role to complete this task. Without experiments, it can definitely indicate that sayings or reports will help to generate the persuasive influence during social works (Heinrichs von Dawans & Domes, 2009). In other words, researchers have displayed their sincerity and what they hope to be gained through the engagement of participants. In such scenario, participants actually will be more initiative to focus on illustrating their wisdoms to show they can help to collect reliable information. 
     
    Performance caused by consistent and ambiguous groups will be different. So, results give through efforts made by both consistent and ambiguous groups will be different as well. Since these two words have their own meanings and it is normal that when setting them as engaged participants, different results will be generated significantly. Within the minds of people of these two groups, they will have different attitudes when facing new things such as the new job, eating new foods or considering how to make contributions to this research project. Also, people of different characteristics will have different level abilities when facing new things which will still affect their attitudes during the recognition process. 
     
    It is quite important for experiment’s designer to clearly point out relevant obligations for participants can better engage in. For researchers, they prefer to find truth through the testing to support the analysis. If they cannot be professional to let participants understand their special roles within the project, even if all people are enthusiastic, results cannot help to meet what researchers hope to acquire in the real world (Fiske, 2013). So, it can be regarded as a kind of challenge to let researchers effectively interact with participants to reach the expectation. 

    Psychology assignment 代寫:利用實驗進行社會測試

    在線客服

    售前咨詢
    售后咨詢
    微信號
    Essay_Cheery
    微信

    在線客服

    售前咨詢
    售后咨詢
    微信號
    Essay_Cheery
    微信
    英国代写_代写作业_cs代写_英国论文代写哪家好