澳洲Law assignment 代寫:澳大利亞合同法的案例分析

  • 100%原創包過,高質量代寫&免費提供Turnitin報告--24小時客服QQ&微信:273427
  • 解讀澳大利亞合同法的案例分析
     
    本文以澳大利亞《合同法》為基礎,給出法律解釋,以期對本案中的問題提出解決方案。
    溫斯頓與羅恩有業務關系,羅恩是一家當地的油漆制造商,每月購買兩次,用于經營業務。目前的情況是,溫斯頓要求羅恩賠償使用羅恩油漆產品造成的損失。但是,羅恩的答復卻拒絕接受索賠,因為一份通知清楚地表明,公司可以享受免責條款的保護。
    如本案所示,收據和羅恩的標志上均顯示了“羅恩對油漆造成的任何損失或損壞概不負責,無論可能造成多大的損失或損壞”。但溫斯頓表示,他從未看過通知。本文著重分析了羅恩所述通知中的詞語是否具有排除條款所規定的合同效力。如果是這樣,羅恩將不負責收費,溫斯頓將受到收據和簽名上文字的約束。

    The Case Analysis on the Basis of Understanding the Australian Contract Law
     
    This paper gives legal explanations on the basis of Australian Contract Law to work out a solution to deal with issues within the case. 
    Winston has a business relationship with Ron which is a local paint manufacturer to purchase twice a month for the purpose of operating businesses. The current situation is that Winston has required the compensation from Ron for making up for losses caused by using painting products of Ron. However, replies made by Ron have refused to accept the claim due to a notice has clearly shown that the company can enjoy the protection of exclusion clauses. 
     
    As contents shown within the case, a statement of “Ron is not liable for any loss or damage caused by the paint, regardless of how much loss or damage may be caused” has been displayed on both the receipt and the sign of Ron’s. But Winston expressed that he has never read the notice. The paper focuses on analyzing whether words within the notice that stated by Ron will have the contractual effect to be protected under the exclusion clauses. If so, Ron will not be responsible for charges and Winston will be bound by words on the receipt and the sign. 

    澳洲Law assignment 代寫:澳大利亞合同法的案例分析

    綜上所述,本案中的兩種不同情況表明,羅恩可以受到保護,理解排除條款,拒絕支付溫斯頓收取的賠償金。必須了解合同法中有關排除條款的細節,以便作出正確的法律決定,保障當事人的權利。第一種情形解釋了當事人未簽訂合同時的情形,以及如何處理案件中的舉證問題,在收據和羅恩的簽字內證明文字將有效地保護其利益。第二種情況解釋了另一種情況,即溫斯頓清楚地理解了這些詞的含義。在這種情況下,羅恩的利益仍然需要得到保護。

    In conclusion, two different situations within this case have indicated that Ron can be protected understand exclusion clauses to refuse to pay for the compensation charged by Winston. It is essential to understand details about exclusion clauses within the contract laws so that correct legal determinations can be made to guarantee the rights of the parties. The first situation explained the situation when business parties have not signed a contract and how to deal with the issue of the case to prove words within the receipt and the sign of Ron will be effective to protect its benefits. The second situation has explained an opposite situation that Winston has clearly understood the meaning of those words. In such scenario, benefits of Ron still need to be given the protection. 

    澳洲Law assignment 代寫:澳大利亞合同法的案例分析

    在線客服

    售前咨詢
    售后咨詢
    微信號
    Essay_Cheery
    微信

    在線客服

    售前咨詢
    售后咨詢
    微信號
    Essay_Cheery
    微信
    英国代写_代写作业_cs代写_英国论文代写哪家好